On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote: > On 7/14/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's just a Solomon judgement situation. That can work out well, but I > > really hate when it's forced and used to test patience. > > If Juerd is right about this being a solomonian situation, let me just > give up my baby to the other woman by saying: > > * "It's hers." It's not important what syntax you give it. `./` is ok, > but I trust @larry to make the right choice there. > > * "Please don't hurt my baby." Let `.foo` still mean `$_.foo`, > unconditionally. That's all that really matters.
Yes, let .foo still mean $_.foo, unconditionally, please. The `./` is nice, but I'm willing to give up the syntax in favor of letting .foo always mean $_.foo. Autrijus joked? about $?.method once (instead of ./method), in case we need any more bad alternatives for $?SELF.method. But I also trust @larry, or %larry, or even $larry, to make a decent choice that will serve the community well. So long as .foo (pretty please) means $_.foo all the time (with sugar on top?). -kolibrie
