--- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One idea might be to try using Data::Dump::Streamer for your tests. > It > will serialize the lexical context that the subroutine was compiled > with (including bound anonymous subroutines and their lexical > context). > > A small hack (that i would be happy to work with you to put into the > next release) might allow you to rename the vars the in the sub as > you > wanted. IE, it could normalize all vars that are lexical bound to the > subroutine so that comparisons would be easier. Of course by default > DDS wouldnt consider the subs the same unless the values of said vars > were the same too...
That's sounds wonderful. The other day I was actually looking into what it might take to hack B::Deparse to normalize the variable names. Then I looked at the code :) (It actually didn't look that hard, but I haven't tried yet). I won't have time to return to this problem for a couple of days, but I'm glad to know there's a path to follow. Cheers, Ovid -- If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send follow up questions to the list. Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
