Hi, Matt Fowles wrote: > On 9/21/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> foo(1,2,3); # &infix:<,> *not* called >> foo (1,2,3); # same as >> foo( (1,2,3) ); # &infix:<,> called > > Do you mean this to read? > > foo(1,2,3); # &infix:<,> *not* called > foo .(1,2,3); # &infix:<,> *not* called > > foo (1,2,3); # &infix:<,> called > foo( (1,2,3) ); # &infix:<,> called
Right. Should have added an extra \n. --Ingo
