On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:31, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > > Hmm. That's a good point. Maybe the way to approach this would be > > to include a default harness for use by developer tools, which > > would include more chattiness about passing TODO tests. > > My perfect developer tool would complain noisily about failing tests (and give > all of the diagnostic information for me to debug them), highlight bonus > tests (and give the diagnostic information for me to promote them), and > summarize everything else. If it passes, increment the counter but don't > tell me. > > How would that work for you?
My only thought is that is that it should be possible to easily control whether unexpected TODO passes are treated as "bonuses" or as "failures". And IMO when building perl itself it should default to the latter. yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
