On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > > >What happened to the factorial PASM example? It seems to have > >disappeared and it hasn't re-appeared as a PIR example either. > > It used bogus high numbers beyond int32 range and was just broken.
Only because it was using integer registers. Limiting it to low factorial values or using Integer pmcs would resolve the issue. I'm going to add a PIR example using Integer pmcs unless there are any objections. -J --
pgpzfTlJbDhom.pgp
Description: PGP signature
