* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060315 01:52]: > That's why the general Perl 6 Pod syntax allows any block construct to be > labelled: > > =begin comment (explanation) > The devil made me write this code > =end comment > > =begin comment (future implementation) > Add a :devil option > =end comment > > =begin comment (design) > See www.dev.il/design/S25.pod > =end comment > > =begin comment (etc. etc.) > >:-) > =end comment
But are we still applying huffman encoding here? I mean: do we really write that little comments that long constructs are acceptable? What about =comment explain The devil made me write this code =comment future Add a :devil option =comment design See www.dev.il/design/S25.pod =comment etc. etc. >:-) =cut Much cleaner, and I don't like Pascal. -- Regards, MarkOv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net