On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:50:27 -0700 "Andrew Whitworth via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just warnings about redefining the snprintf macro. It was defined in > two different places, and it's definition was based on both of those > two flags above. I was looking for a way to unify the definitions for > snprintf, and I wanted to know if a unification could go further then > that as well.
Ok, thanks for the clarification. How do you think we should fix it? Mark
