Hi,
Ovid wrote:
> OK, I'm tired of submitting bug reports.
Still bug reports are valuable. When you find your motivation again,
please continue to submit them.
> Instead, I'll include my new 'Test.pm' as an attachment rather than a patch.
> You can try it locally and see if I've just screwed up royally.
Very nice. It dies on a few tests here (they all seem to be related to
Junctions or Weird Types[tm]), but I guess we can fix that somehow.
> Aside from exporting a 'die_on_fail' sub (which is a godsend for debugging),
> it also started adding very primitive have/want diagnostics:
>
> not ok 28 - 3rd element is trimmed again with no effect # TODO trim on lists
> # have: undef
> # want: "baz"
> not ok 29 - 0 is not true # TODO expected failures
> # Expected a true value.
> # have: 0
> not ok 30 - expected failure # TODO expected failures
> # Expected a false value.
> # have: ["a", "b", "c"]
> not ok 31 -
> # have: ["a", "b", "c"]
> # want: ["a", "b", "z"]
++
++
++
And so on ;-)
>
> It's not a patch because I got tired of adding exceptions for bugs, but then
> I realized that the bugs might be in my brain :) Specifically, I started
> adding stuff like this because of lack of a .perl method:
>
> my $have = $passed.WHAT eq any(<Match Exception Iterator>)
> ?? $passed
> !! $passed.perl;
Maybe ``try({$passed.perl}) // ~$passed'' works better, I hope to find
tuits today to see if it makes a difference.
Cheers,
Moritz
