philippe.beauch...@bell.ca wrote: > On the & operator... are you saying that it would operate basically as > expected... > allowing sets of rules and'ed rather than or's with the | ?
Yes, with the limitation that both parts separated by & have to match the same length of string, so that for example ^ [ a+ & . ** 3 ] could only match exactly 3 a's. If you don't want to them tied to the same length, you look-ahead assertions instead. Cheers, Moritz
