On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Moritz Lenz <mor...@faui2k3.org> wrote:
> Given the current version number scheme (year.month), it's highly > unlikely that we'll ever see a Rakudo 1.0. > > So I'd change that to "after a production release of a Perl 6 compiler" People might be expecting that when Rakudo is ready it would have a 1.0 release. I sure did. Using year + month is nice in a way, but it means that you don't immediately know if the release is production vs devel, or whether it's a major vs minor release. Daniel. -- No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
