# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #107844] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # <URL: https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=107844 >
<tadzik> about wrap again: https://gist.github.com/1585730 Included here for completeness: ┌─[tadzik@yavin4]─[~/src/perl/bailador] (master)* └─[%]─> cat lib/Bailador.pm module Bailador; our sub our_template { return "(our template)" } sub exp_template is export { return "(exp template)" } sub hook is export { &our_template.wrap: { "wrapped {callsame()}" }; &exp_template.wrap: { "wrapped {callsame()}" }; } ┌─[tadzik@yavin4]─[~/src/perl/bailador] (master)* └─[%]─> cat examples/app.pl use Bailador; sub foo { say Bailador::our_template(); say exp_template(); } hook(); foo(); ┌─[tadzik@yavin4]─[~/src/perl/bailador] (master)* └─[%]─> perl6 examples/app.pl wrapped (our template) (exp template) <masak> tadzik: looks like a bug to me. <tadzik> S11 uses the word "binding" when it comes to exportation, this looks more like copying <masak> tadzik: haven't read what S11 says about it, but binding makes a lot of sense and copying doesn't. S11:137: Importing via C<use> binds into the current lexical scope by default <masak> tadzik: will you submit a rakudobug, or shall I? <tadzik> masak: go on * masak submits rakudobug