On 04/08/2012 10:01 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > The parrotapi-* thing would avoid an update of the parrot package, but there's > nothing that would avoid an update of, say, libdata-dumper-parrot, and it > would > leave the system with an older version of parrot and a newer version of the > bytecode library, which, as Patrick pointed out, are not compatible. If the > library depends on parrotapi-* too, it is not updated until every other > parrotapi-* reverse dependencies are ready to be updated.
Then +1 to updating all the binary packages that contain compiled bytecode, with a Depends on parrotapi-*. Allison