On Sun Oct 04 05:49:52 2015, pesc...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat Jan 03 08:51:32 2015, barto...@gmx.de wrote:
> > On Mon Sep 23 12:09:04 2013, masak wrote:
> > > lue (>):
> > > > The infix:["..."] form of declaration should at least have a
> > > > better
> > > > error message.
> > >
> > > Not just that. S02, S03, S06, and S12 contain examples of this
> > > syntax. So
> > > at the upper end this should actually be allowed, not just have a
> > > better
> > > error message.
> > >
> > > Of course, arbitrary values inside the [] only make sense if
> > > they're
> > > known at compile-time (constants, for example). Care will need to
> > > be
> > > taken; tests will need to be written.
> > >
> > > On the caller side, even runtime values are fine; see S12:444 for
> > > an
> > > example.
> >
> > Just a status update: This does not work (yet). On the plus side
> > there
> > is no longer an internal error message:
> >
> > $ perl6 -e 'sub infix:["@"] ($a, $b) { 42 }'
> > ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling -e
> > Colon pair value '"@"' too complex to use in name
> > at -e:1
> > ------> sub infix:["@"]⏏ ($a, $b) { 42 }
>
> I've implemented this in Rakudo commit
> d0885e56e8fe1c2cd280e419ab3edfb9afe3443c, tests have been added to
> roast in commit 21a9ea0f2dd21294a7539a0bf474d465e356535e for this and
> the related ticket #117737
Great! I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.
