Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>
> David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >"overlay" is reminiscent of old IBM machines swapping parts of the
> >program out because there isn't enough core.
>
> Which is exactly why I chose it - the places these things makes sense are
> on little machines where memory is a premium.
>
> our add-ons are going to be loaded on need
> by the parent and only depend on the parent.
Oh, and then they will be unloaded if we need the space for something
else. I understand now, thanks.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subroutine one-arg, him called no-arg, get $_-arg. Ug.
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Alan Burlison
- RE: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Al Lipscomb
- RE: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... mooring
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions from c... Michael Maraist
- Re: RFC 146 (v1) Remove socket functions fr... Dan Sugalski
