At 04:24 PM 10/30/2001 +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 10:19:10AM -0500, Michael Fischer wrote:
> > Also, my understanding was that the goto *pc _was_ indeed very
> > gcc specific, and therefore a no-no for parrot. Thoughts?
>
>If we have switchable runops cores, I'm cool with having
>compiler-specific stuff. But wouldn't it be cool if we had
>scalar PMCs first?
It would indeed be cool to have scalar PMCs. :)
On the other hand, there's no reason not to have folks doing both, as their
interests lead. It'd help keep us honest having multiple cores, and give
the config system a good workout too.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
