At 11:02 AM 10/8/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>Currently, instead of pushing the contents of fixed registers onto the
>stack, the registers themselves float on top of the stack. That doesn't
>preserve register contents on a push_x, as the registers are now in a new
>memory location. After toying with fixed registers per interpreter, I
>decided that it probably wasn't worth it in the long haul. (Since it's
>doubtful, given the size of our register sets, that this would need to be
>done often.) Instead, I'm proposing a parallel set of data-preserving
>push_x ops, save_x. Patch after .sig.
Cool, and thanks. That was one of the plans, I've just been swamped and
haven't had a chance to get to it. (I still have to dig out from this
weekend's mail, too...)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
