This is making the index variable into an a wrapper object.
Since the underlying value can't (or shouldn't) know which of the n
containers it is in.
<chaim>
>>>>> "JSD" == Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JSD> Interesting. I must have missed this. I'm not wild about the syntax,
JSD> but I like the idea. If everything become objects under-the-hood,
JSD> then we could have:
JSD> for $a (@array) { print "$a is at $a->index\n"; }
JSD> No, I'm not wild about that either, but it's an idea.
--
Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, p... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statemen... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counte... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit co... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counte... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, p... John McNamara
