> I hate suggesting work, but it sounds like you've got a really good > handle on this. The current RFCs (6 and 16) only address whether or not > strict should be on or off. Do you have any interest in writing an RFC > that fully details how we could fundamentally change the way variables > are scoped? No, I'm going to Las Vegas on Monday and I don't have time. I also haven't thought it through. Feel free to use, modify, distribute, etc. any of the notes that I've sent so far.
Re: C as default (was Re: RFC 16 (v1))
mjd-perl-list-language-strict Sat, 05 Aug 2000 12:04:03 -0700
- Re: RFC 16 (v1) Keep default Perl free of co... Peter Scott
- C<strict> as default (was Re: RFC... Daniel Chetlin
- Re: C<strict> as default (was... J. David Blackstone
- Re: C<strict> as default (was... mjd-perl-list-language-strict
- Re: C<strict> as default ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: C<strict> as defa... mjd-perl-list-lang-strict
- Re: C<strict> as... Nathan Wiger
- Re: C<strict>... mjd-perl-list-language-strict
- Re: C<strict> as... Nathan Wiger
- Clarification on Defau... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Clarification ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Clarificat... Peter Scott
- Re: Clarification ... mjd-perl-list-language-strict
- Re: Clarificat... Ted Ashton
- Re: Clarificat... Bart Lateur
- Re: Clarificat... Ted Ashton
- Re: Clarificat... Bart Lateur
- Re: Clarificat... Monty Taylor
