>>>>> "PC" == Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PC> Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why would anyone want to select a different method based upon the >> arguments. PC> Have you seen Class::Multimethods? This kind of despatch can be very PC> useful. Of course, the existence of Class::Multimethods proves that it PC> can be done already so there may be no need to put it in the core. You answered the HOW, not the WHY. The question for the audience is WHY, I would want to do this. (As a counterpoint. Dr. Myers argues very strongly against this.) <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloading Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloadin... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloadin... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overlo... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method ov... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based metho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-ba... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method ov... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based metho... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloadin... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overlo... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method ov... David L. Nicol
- RE: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloadin... Evan Howarth
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overlo... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method ov... Piers Cawley
