Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloading

[David L. Nicol]

Graham Barr wrote:

> 
> I would add to that, that as long as the addition of this does not effect
> the performance of calling the methods that want the "relaxed perl5-ish"
> semantics.
> 
> Graham.


The IMPLEMENTATION of the rfc97 working document (unfortuneately
not web accessible, I may change that) now reads in part:

Perhaps the method is first looked up by name, and then further
dispatch is done if needed.  This would exempt methods using "relaxed
perl5-ish semantics" from any additional processing overhead.



-- 
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                         Useless use of a void in constant context