Damian Conway wrote:
> So C<with> is going to have to do some pretty freaky magic to work out
> it should call that sub as part of the C<print>. And call it with a
> specifically ordered argument list.
Yes, I never said it would work, just that it looked nicer :)
> However, your suggestion *did* spark an excellent idea for me to do,
> with named placeholders and named subroutine parameters. Many thanks!
We're still not even. I got quite a few ideas from your book.
Clayton
--
Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehandle... Damian Conway
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Robert Mathews
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Damian Conway
