At 02:25 PM 8/24/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>But
>
>($foo, $baz, @bar) = (1,(2,3),4) # $foo = 1 $baz=2, @bar=(3,4)
>
>Actually, looking at it like that makes it an ugly situation. The 'new'
>expectation would be to have it become
> # $foo=1 $baz=2 @bar=(4)
Wouldn't that be $baz = 3, since the middle list would be taken in scalar
context?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function return... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function r... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large functi... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large fu... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolutio... Glenn Linderman
