Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
> And what if it's a built-in? What if it's not quite a built-in,
> but an import? What if you don't *know* whether it's a built-in?
I would hope that the distinction (at the syntactic level) goes away.
(Except for the small set of exceptional built-ins, which clearly
could be exceptional wrt this RFC as well, i.e. not interpolable.)
(Note, I'm not arguing in favor of the RFC.)
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
- RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subrout... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines John Porter
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 252 (v1) Interpolation of subroutines Michael G Schwern
