On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:41:24PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Damian Conway wrote [and John Porter reformats]:
> >
> > @bar[$foo]; # Access element int($foo) of array @bar
> > %bar{$foo}; # Access entry "$foo" of hash %bar
> > @bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
> > %bar[$foo]; # Syntax error
>
> And why is that superior to:
>
> @bar[$foo]; # Access element int($foo) of array @bar
> %bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
> @bar{$foo}; # Syntax error
> %bar[$foo]; # Access entry "$foo" of hash %bar
As I said in another mail, consider
$bar[$foo];
$bar{$foo};
Graham.
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Buddha Buck
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Edward Peschko
