On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:14:06PM +0100, frederic fabbro wrote:
> I'm not even sure how that would parse, though that:
> @keep <~ grep /good/ <~ @list ~> grep /bad!/ ~> @throw;
> would go like:
> ( @keep <~ grep /good/ <~ @list ) ~> grep /bad!/ ~> @throw;
>
> which is probably not what i wanted...
Oh, then we just need a syntax to split the streams. ... I know!
@list ~| grep /bad!/ ~> @throw ~| grep /good/ ~> @keep;
which, of course, could be written in the more readable form:
@list ~| grep /bad!/ ~> @throw
~| grep /good/ ~> @keep;
And that, of course, leads us to sort of "unzip" were mutual exclusion
is not a requisite:
@list ~| grep length == 1 ~> @onecharthings
~| grep [0..29] ~> @numberslessthan30
~| grep /^\w+$/ ~> @words
~| grep $_%2==0 ~> @evennumbers;
:-)
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
