On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Hm, if ==> and <== are made special syntax, maybe this would be
: possible?
:
: @foo ==> zip <== @bar
It's already the case that <== binds tighter, so it should work the
same as
@foo ==> (zip <== @bar)
or
zip <== @bar <== @foo
or
zip(@bar; @foo)
Which, considering zip *is* going to care about multidimensional slices,
should do the right thing, presuming you really wanted @bar in front.
Ordinarily I'd write it
@foo ==>
zip <== @bar
to make it a little clearer.
You'll note that <== is really just a version of ; that doesn't
require brackets.
Larry
