On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:20:21AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:55:43AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> : But perhaps the reduce operator is some of that sufficiently advanced
> : technology that "knows" how the operator it wraps is slotted and does
> : something appropriate.
>
> Possibly. Or we just define infix .{}. and .[]. variants, or some such.
It's funny what a big difference that extra character makes. As much
as I disliked Juerd's idea to make infix .{} work, I wouldn't mind an
infix .{}. operator.
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
