Re: given vs for

[TSa]

HaloO,

John M. Dlugosz wrote:

   for @foo {...}

is actually short for:

   for @foo <-> $_ {...}

Ups, I missed that one. Do we also have the fill-me idiom

     for @foo <- $_ {...}

And again the question if this is the same as

     for @foo -> $_ is ref {...}

Regards, TSa.
--

"The unavoidable price of reliability is simplicity"
  -- C.A.R. Hoare