Re: Q: Is there a reason why I can't do this?

[Daniel Carrera]

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Chas. Owens <chas.ow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The [conditional operator][1] is now spelled test ?? true !! false not
> test ? true : false.
>

Thanks!

Now the following code works:

%matches{  $r1 > $r2 ?? $p1 !! $p2 }++;


I'm still having trouble with the other alternative:

$r1 > $r2 ?? { %matches{$p1}++ } !! { %matches{$p2}++ };

Now the problem is that %matches is empty. I'm not sure why. Maybe you can't
have code blocks inside ?? ... !! ...

Daniel.
-- 
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large number
of electrons were severely inconvenienced.