On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Anton Popov wrote: >> >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > are there any news about fixing buggy behavior of SuperLU_DIST, exactly >> what >> > is described here: >> > >> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.mc >> s.anl.gov_pipermail_petsc-2Dusers_2015-2DAugust_026802.html& >> d=CwIBAg&c=54IZrppPQZKX9mLzcGdPfFD1hxrcB__aEkJFOKJFd00&r= >> DUUt3SRGI0_JgtNaS3udV68GRkgV4ts7XKfj2opmiCY&m=RwruX6ckX0t9H8 >> 9Z6LXKBfJBOAM2vG1sQHw2tIsSQtA&s=bbB62oGLm582JebVs8xsUej_OX0e >> UwibAKsRRWKafos&e= ? >> > >> > I'm using 3.7.4 and still get SEGV in pdgssvx routine. Everything works >> fine >> > with 3.5.4. >> > >> > Do I still have to stick to maint branch, and what are the chances for >> these >> > fixes to be included in 3.7.5? >> >> 3.7.4. is off maint branch [as of a week ago]. So if you are seeing >> issues with it - its best to debug and figure out the cause. >> > > This bug is indeed inside of superlu_dist, and we started having this > issue from PETSc-3.6.x. I think superlu_dist developers should have fixed > this bug. We forgot to update superlu_dist?? This is not a thing users > could debug and fix. > > I have many people in INL suffering from this issue, and they have to stay > with PETSc-3.5.4 to use superlu_dist. > Do you have this bug with the latest maint? Matt > Fande > > > >> >> Satish >> > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener