Dear Dave, 1) Views View pseudo-modification works fine. It was implemented in pgSchema->pgView->Let Defition property. This allows the modification of view definition only (not the name of the view).
This is OK because view names should not be changed (views can be called inside functions or other views). The problem with pgSchema->pgView->Let Defition is that if a wrong definition is entered, an error is reported and the definition is saved in PostgreSQL. This ***might*** be a new feature of PostgreSQL 7.2. I don't remember 7.1 accepted wrong definitions for views, but I may be wrong. We need to rollback views in such a case. Does this means implementing view modification at pgSchema->View level? 2) Triggers It should be possible to change the name of a trigger as well as the underlying function, but not the trigger table itself. Therefore, it sounds like trigger pseudo modification should be implemented in pgSchema->Triggers. What is your opinion? 3) CVS commit The current implementation of views works well. Therefore, I will commit it to CVS in a few minutes so that you can review the code. Cheers, Jean-Michel
