I am confused till now I have been reading that pharo does not care
about the past or does not care about being another Smalltalk
implementation and it cares only being Smalltalk inspired . What
changed in the meant time ? Why so much talk about other Smalltalks
and ANSI-Smalltalk ?
Nothing we do not diverge for the fun in general. We diverge to improve
(of course people can discuss it and think that we are idiots)
Now if adding a method in a package can help people porting to Pharo we
should not be stupid :)
Stef
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:28 AM Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ben Coman wrote
>>> Because the proper English spelling is with lowercase
> +1.... So it may be useful to have an ANSICompatibility package
+1 to having the proper spelling (that we've fought so hard to
have) as the
only one in the image. And +1 for a compatibility package if there
is a
proven demand for such a thing.
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Need-a-decision-on-subString-vs-substring-tp4847932p4848193.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
