agreed :)
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Guillermo Polito < guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, just to not mistake my intentions :) > > I don't care WHO removed the retry or WHO fixed it. I care about the WHY. > > If the WHY is not clear nor documented, we risk to make the mistake again. > Please, let all of us be strict on the issue reports we do, and even > stricter on ourselves. We need to raise the quality bar, not move it down! > > And regarding this particular issue, I'd like to raise a warning. Let's > not fix symptoms, fix causes. If we fix the symptom, the problem is still > there. And moreover, if we fix the symptom and we lose track of it, we may > forget unless somebody realizes weeks afterwards and it is too late (not > this case fortunately). > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> tx them too. >> This is great to be surrounded by all you guys! >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.kriva...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> The UI Manager problem was fixed by Pablo and Guille >>> >>> -- Pavel >>> >>> 2017-12-16 13:06 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> tx pavel >>>> >>>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Krivanek < >>>> pavel.kriva...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The problems were related UIManager initialization and consequences >>>>> of the opening of the Welcome window. >>>>> >>>>> -- Pavel >>>>> >>>>> 2017-12-16 9:12 GMT+01:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Pavel what was the problem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Stef >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Pavel Krivanek < >>>>>> pavel.kriva...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The variable value was reverted to the original value. Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Pavel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-12-12 20:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel Krivanek <pavel.kriva...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, with Marcus we decreased the retryTimes variable two weeks >>>>>>>> ago to 1 because in that time the validations were in really bad shape >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> literally every validation failed on some random issue and the retries >>>>>>>> caused enormous build times. It was producing more troubles than >>>>>>>> profit. It >>>>>>>> probably can be reverted now because the main problem of the validation >>>>>>>> instability was suppressed. I will prepare a PR. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Pavel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-12-12 18:52 GMT+01:00 Guillermo Polito < >>>>>>>> guillermopol...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see that we are retrying tests only once, which is causing most >>>>>>>>> (if not all) pull requests to fail sporadically... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe it got lost because of a mistake? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, I'd like that changes in the build process are discussed in >>>>>>>>> the mailing list from time to time... I've put a lot of effort into >>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>> it work and if we have regressions I'd like to understand them... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Guille >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Guille Polito >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Research Engineer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CRIStAL - UMR 9189 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr >>>>>>>>> <http://www.cnrs.fr>* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 <+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > > > > Guille Polito > > Research Engineer > > Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille > > CRIStAL - UMR 9189 > > French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr > <http://www.cnrs.fr>* > > > *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> > > *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 <+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013> >
