That was aftermarket. I had one too. Made it look like all one unit.

Steven Medved <steve_noreen at msn.com> wrote:  Yes, I have only owned one 
version, the legs slid in and a trim piece covered them. Was this aftermarket?

Steve



> From: Bruce78rpm at comcast.net> To: phono-l at oldcrank.org> Date: Mon, 28 
> Jul 2008 16:45:12 -0400> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor IX> > Yes, I believe I 
> have.> Weren't there two versions? one a little more elaborate then the 
> other, and > designed to cleverly fit in around the legs and front and back 
> to give the > illusion that the Machine and Stand are all part of one unit??> 
> > Bruce> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Medved" > To: "Antique 
> Phonograph List" 
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:52 AM> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor IX> > > > 
> Bruce,> >> > Have you ever seen the record holding stands sold with them?> >> 
> > Steve> >> >> >> >> From: Bruce78rpm at comcast.net> To: phono-l at 
> oldcrank.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul > >> 2008 18:49:22 -0400> Subject: Re: 
> [Phono-L] Victor IX> > I just purchased > >> a beautiful all original Victor 
> IX (with legs), clean as a > whistle > >> inside and out complete with 
> several extras including a like new >
> >> "Dustoff" record cleaner and some new/old stock unopened needle > >> 
> >> packs(medium > tone Gilt edge by Bagshaw,Victrola tungstone,and > >> 
> >> Brilliantone.) This was > from private party who contacted by email, and > 
> >> >> offered the whole package to > me for $125.00. From the number of 
> >> Victor > >> IX's I see on ebay and craiglist, > I am almost convinced that 
> >> 90% of > >> everyone mfg. by the Victor Talking > Machine Co., still 
> >> exists.> > > >> Bruce> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert 
> >> Wright" > >> > To: "Antique Phonograph List" > >> 
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:14 PM> Subject: Re: > >> [Phono-L] Victor IX> > 
> > > Agreed, I think there's a difference between > >> "what someone could get 
> for > >> > it"> > and "what one of us would pay for it".> >> >> > ----- 
> Original > > Message ----- > > From: "john robles" > > Sent: > > Sunday, July 
> 27, 2008 3:11 PM> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Victor IX> >> >> > > 
>>I myself am iffy on the price question. If you are selling them for> > > 
>>>>$550-$650 out of your shop (which I assume is an antique shop) those > > 
>>sales> >>are probably to the average public who browse in antique shops > > 
>>and who are> >>not knowledgeable as to the commonality of those machines, > > 
>>I think the> >>valuation of $300 is specific to machines sold between > > 
>>collectors. While > >>it> >>is true that $550-$650 may be a fair price, > > 
>>that machine IS common and> >>collectors usually want to buy something > > 
>>with a margin that they can > >>resell> >>it for someday, so the average > > 
>>collector is looking for a lower price than> >>retail. And some of us are > > 
>>just cheap. :-)> >> > _______________________________________________> > > > 
>>Phono-L mailing list> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org >> > > 
>>_______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> > > > 
>>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org> > 
>>_______________________________________________> > Phono-L ma
iling list> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > 
_______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> 
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to