> The shell is the only thing that will actually require this complexity, yes? > If so, we can put this into the plasma-device shell itself; it does not > need to be re-usable outside of plasma-device (until such time as we find > other use cases for it).
Aren't we supposed to have only plasma-shell shell? :) ATM, I don't see a real use-case to have this kind of complexity for anything apart from the shell. So, yes, it can be in the shell only. > Really looking forward to what solidx will look like, too, as that shoudl be > quite exciting to play with! Yup. Especially making xcb more suited for c++ (now I feel Martin's pain :) ) Cheerio, Ivan -- A program that has not been tested does not work. -- Bjarne Stroustrup _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel