HI, How about ext3? Will it give best performance too for squid caching server?
--- froilanr > On Thu, 16 May 2002 at 19:00, Gino LV.Ledesma wrote: >> Best performance so far: >> Linux + 2.4.18 + ReiserFS + aufs + heap lru >> >> As the Squid developers said, tuning cache replacement is a fruitless >> activity as compared to tuning the file system and the access methods >> (ufs, aufs, diskd). > > Hey, cool. I just updated my Squid settings (I've already been using > ReiserFS so no need to change that). > >> Tip: mount noatail the ReiserFS disks > > noatail? Or maybe you mean noatime and notail? I find this combination > to be the best for speed. :) > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III : <http://jijo.free.net.ph/> > Network Administrator : The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key ID : 0x93B746BE > > > _ > Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at > http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
