why it little "dick" forbes ! what are you doing outside your Mommy's
basement ?

On Oct 2, 4:10 am, RichardForbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are expecting a reasonable reply from a mindless drone like Mikey,
> who cannot be honest about anything?
>
> Good luck on that one.
>
> On Oct 2, 4:03 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Need I go on?
>
> > There are many more where those came from.
>
> > The Link is provided should you care to see many, many more.
>
> > On Oct 2, 1:01 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics2admissions.asp
>
> > > “The elephant in the newsroom is our narrowness. Too often, we wear
> > > liberalism on our sleeve and are intolerant of other lifestyles and
> > > opinions....We’re not very subtle about it at this paper: If you work
> > > here, you must be one of us. You must be liberal, progressive, a
> > > Democrat. I’ve been in communal gatherings in The Post, watching
> > > election returns, and have been flabbergasted to see my colleagues
> > > cheer unabashedly for the Democrats.”
> > > — Washington Post “Book World” editor Marie Arana in a contribution to
> > > the Post’s “daily in-house electronic critiques,” as quoted by Post
> > > media reporter Howard Kurtz in an October 3, 2005 article.
>
> > > “There is, Hugh, I agree with you, a deep anti-military bias in the
> > > media. One that begins from the premise that the military must be
> > > lying, and that American projection of power around the world must be
> > > wrong. I think that that is a hangover from Vietnam, and I think it’s
> > > very dangerous. That’s different from the media doing it’s job of
> > > challenging the exercise of power without fear or favor.”
> > > — ABC News White House correspondent Terry Moran talking with Los
> > > Angeles-based national radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt, May 17,
> > > 2005.
>
> > > “I believe it is true that a significant chunk of the press believes
> > > that Democrats are incompetent but good-hearted, and Republicans are
> > > very efficient but evil.”
> > > — Wall Street Journal political editor John Harwood on the April 23,
> > > 2005 Inside Washington.
>
> > > “I worked for the New York Times for 25 years. I could probably count
> > > on one hand, in the Washington bureau of the New York Times, people
> > > who would describe themselves as people of faith....I think one of the
> > > real built-in biases in the media is towards secularism....You want
> > > diversity in the newsroom, not because of some quota, but because you
> > > have to have diversity to cover the story well and cover all aspects
> > > of a society. And you don’t have religious people making the decisions
> > > about where coverage is focused. And I think that’s one of the
> > > faults.”
> > > — Former New York Times reporter Steve Roberts, now a journalism
> > > professor at George Washington University, on CNN’s Reliable Sources,
> > > March 27, 2005.
>
> > > “Personally, I have a great affection for CBS News....But I stopped
> > > watching it some time ago. The unremitting liberal orientation finally
> > > became too much for me. I still check in, but less and less
> > > frequently. I increasingly drift to NBC News and Fox and MSNBC.”
> > > — Former CBS News President Van Gordon Sauter in an op-ed published
> > > January 13, 2005 in the Los Angeles Times.
>
> > > “The notion of a neutral, non-partisan mainstream press was, to me at
> > > least, worth holding onto. Now it’s pretty much dead, at least as the
> > > public sees things. The seeds of its demise were sown with the best of
> > > intentions in the late 1960s, when the AMMP [American Mainstream Media
> > > Party] was founded in good measure (and ironically enough) by CBS. Old
> > > folks may remember the moment: Walter Cronkite stepped from behind the
> > > podium of presumed objectivity to become an outright foe of the war in
> > > Vietnam. Later, he and CBS’s star White House reporter, Dan Rather,
> > > went to painstaking lengths to make Watergate understandable to
> > > viewers, which helped seal Richard Nixon’s fate as the first President
> > > to resign. The crusades of Vietnam and Watergate seemed like a good
> > > idea at the time, even a noble one, not only to the press but perhaps
> > > to a majority of Americans. The problem was that, once the AMMP
> > > declared its existence by taking sides, there was no going back. A
> > > party was born.”
> > > — Newsweek’s chief political reporter, Howard Fineman, “The ‘Media
> > > Party’ is over: CBS’ downfall is just the tip of the iceberg,” January
> > > 11 , 2005.
>
> > > “Most members of the establishment media live in Washington and New
> > > York. Most of them don’t drive pickup trucks, most of them don’t have
> > > guns, most of them don’t go to NASCAR, and every day we’re not out in
> > > areas that care about those things and deal with those things as part
> > > of their daily lives, we are out of touch with a lot of America and
> > > with a lot of America that supports George W. Bush.”
> > > — ABC News Political Director Mark Halperin during live television
> > > coverage immediately before John Kerry’s concession speech on November
> > > 3, 2004.
>
> > > “I know a lot of you believe that most people in the news business are
> > > liberal. Let me tell you, I know a lot of them, and they were almost
> > > evenly divided this time. Half of them liked Senator Kerry; the other
> > > half hated President Bush.”
> > > — CBS’s Andy Rooney on the November 7, 2004 60 Minutes.
>
> > > “There’s one other base here: the media. Let’s talk a little media
> > > bias here. The media, I think, wants Kerry to win. And I think they’re
> > > going to portray Kerry and Edwards — I’m talking about the
> > > establishment media, not Fox, but — they’re going to portray Kerry and
> > > Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic and all, there’s
> > > going to be this glow about them that some, is going to be worth,
> > > collectively, the two of them, that’s going to be worth maybe 15
> > > points.”
> > > — Newsweek’s Evan Thomas on Inside Washington, July 10, 2004.
>
> > > The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz: “You’ve said on the program Inside
> > > Washington that because of the portrayal of Kerry and Edwards as
> > > ‘young and dynamic and optimistic,’ that that’s worth maybe 15
> > > points.”
> > > Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: “Stupid thing to say. It was completely wrong.
> > > But I do think that, I do think that the mainstream press, I’m not
> > > talking about the blogs and Rush and all that, but the mainstream
> > > press favors Kerry. I don’t think it’s worth 15 points. That was just
> > > a stupid thing to say.”
> > > Kurtz: “Is it worth five points?”
> > > Thomas: “Maybe, maybe.”
> > > — Exchange on CNN’s Reliable Sources, October 17, 2004.
>
> > > Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham: “The work of the evening, obviously, is
> > > to connect George W. Bush to the great war leaders of the modern era.
> > > You’re going to hear about Churchill projecting power against public
> > > opinion....”
> > > MSNBC’s Chris Matthews: “But Iraq was a popular cause when he first
> > > started it. It wasn’t like Churchill speaking against the Nazis.”
> > > Meacham: “That’s not the way the Republican Party sees it. They think
> > > that all of us and the New York Times are against them.”
> > > Matthews: “Well, they’re right about the New York Times, and they may
> > > be right about all of us.”
> > > — Exchange shortly after 8:30pm EDT during MSNBC’s live convention
> > > coverage, August 30, 2004.
>
> > > On Oct 2, 12:46 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > [ let me say this first i stole this from another poster "
> > > > rockskipper" and i wish to thank him and Larry
> > > > king ! ]                 Last night, on The Larry King Show, one of
> > > > the republican surrogates,
> > > > in reference to the news reports that Sarah Palin is in actuality a
> > > > real bimbo -- exclaimed that usual bull-shit line -- "...the liberal
> > > > media" ..something or other.   Mr. King promptly interrupted her, and
> > > > asked the question, I've been waiting for someone, on one of these
> > > > political programs, to finally ask one of these republican 'whinners'
> > > > -- he asked -- "What liberal media are you talking about?"  And he
> > > > had
> > > > the gall to ask her to name the media she was criticizing."
>
> > > > OMG -- the bitch face was at a complete loss for words!  She couldn't
> > > > name a one (singular - medium).  She was dumbfounded!
>
> > > > Larry went on for her to specify her complaint, at which "media" he
> > > > asked -- "Limbaugh" -- Newsweek -- Bill O'Reilly - Sean Hannity --
> > > > "just name the ones you have in mind" -- In other words, lady - what
> > > > in hell are you talking about?
>
> > > > My hat is off to good old Larry "the King" --  & defender of the
> > > > truth.  In a sea of wimpy wannabees, he a supreme journalist!   He IS
> > > > the 'Master of The Universe' in my book today!   Mr. King did what
> > > > any
> > > > honest professional interviewer -- should always do -- he called her
> > > > out;   and by doing so, revealed to his audience -- that the lady
> > > > surrogate, and her bull-crap accusations against the so called
> > > > "liberal media" is just what I called it earlier -- 'a line of neo-
> > > > con
> > > > republican garbage'  that I am sick of hearing!
>
> > > > THANKS LARRY!
>
> > > > God Bless Ya' -- you old pro!
> > > > You ARE the man -- Mr. King.
>
> > > > Now, how about some of you other motor mouths -- step up to the stove
> > > > and give these bullshitters a little of their own heat, just for a
> > > > change!!!  What ya' say -- if you're gonna' call yourselves
> > > > journalist
> > > > -- you have to stop acting like weenies and pussies.  PERIOD.
>
> > > > This election is way too important this time folks, to give anybody a
> > > > free pass on anything!!  Let's get down to the
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to