The sad thing is that in the approach to the election, the GOP has
discovered an elephant in the room, and that they are going to vote
for it. That is interesting, as the elephant is probably a better
choice than either their presidential, or their vice presidential
candidate. Of course they have to take credit for the candidate they
provided eight years ago.

On Oct 7, 6:55 am, "[ a patriotic Republican  ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> point out any lies that are in this article if you can .
>
> On Oct 7, 6:51 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > how does one dispute lies murky.  you should know being the consummate
> > liar, so teach me the fine points.  how does one dispute lies?  putz
> > and THE DEMS ARE IN CHARGE.
>
> > On Oct 7, 6:47 am, "[ a patriotic Republican  ]"
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > so the answer is no you can't dispute  and of the points made .
>
> > > On Oct 7, 6:39 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > simple answer for your simple mind.  YOU DEMS ARE IN CHARGE OF
> > > > CONGRESS.  and any poll conducted by the daily kooks is about as
> > > > honest as you being a repulican.  you crack me up murky, always good
> > > > for a laugh.  putz
>
> > > > On Oct 7, 6:20 am, "[ a patriotic Republican  ]"
>
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > can you dispute any of the points made in this article oh witless
> > > > > one ?
>
> > > > > On Oct 7, 6:17 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > bwahahahahahahaha  snicker snicker hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>
> > > > > > On Oct 7, 6:13 am, "[ a patriotic Republican  ]"
>
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > A Country in Shambles, Under GOP 
> > > > > > > Rulehttp://www.alternet.org/election08/101872/
> > > > > > > The overarching reality of the country is that we've lived under
> > > > > > > unchallenged Republican rule, and the country has virtually 
> > > > > > > collapsed
> > > > > > > on every level.
> > > > > > > There are few things that make political coverage more unbearable 
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > and more distorting -- than The David Brooks Syndrome: the 
> > > > > > > extremely
> > > > > > > patronizing and ill-informed pretense, shared by media and 
> > > > > > > right-wing
> > > > > > > elites alike, that they can study the Little Common Person like a 
> > > > > > > zoo
> > > > > > > animal, and then translate and give voice to their simple-minded, 
> > > > > > > good-
> > > > > > > hearted, salt-of-the-earth perspectives. Rarely has this mentality
> > > > > > > been so transparent as in the wake of the Biden-Palin debate, as
> > > > > > > pundits and right-wing polemicists like Brooks, Peggy Noonan and 
> > > > > > > Rich
> > > > > > > "Starbursts" Lowry rushed forward to proclaim giddily that Regular
> > > > > > > Americans would love Sarah Palin and this love could even help 
> > > > > > > McCain
> > > > > > > win, despite -- or, really, because of -- her vapid, content-free
> > > > > > > telegenic presence.
>
> > > > > > > Actual empirical evidence -- called "polling data" -- has almost
> > > > > > > uniformly demonstrated how false these condescending pats on the 
> > > > > > > head
> > > > > > > are, as every single poll conducted thus far (at least that I'm 
> > > > > > > aware
> > > > > > > of) found that Americans believed that Biden won and is the far 
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > serious candidate for office, and huge numbers continue to have
> > > > > > > profound doubts about Palin's fitness for office. And the first
> > > > > > > tracking poll to report a full post-debate day of polling -- the
> > > > > > > Research 2000 poll for Daily Kos -- finds Obama with a 13-point 
> > > > > > > lead,
> > > > > > > his largest ever. This joint right-wing/pundit claim that 
> > > > > > > Americans
> > > > > > > would swoon in the face of Palin's empty chatter, self-conscious
> > > > > > > folksiness and chronic, seizure-like winking says much more about
> > > > > > > those making the claim than it does about their Regular People
> > > > > > > subjects.
>
> > > > > > > As polling data conclusively demonstrates, the mindset of the 
> > > > > > > voting
> > > > > > > public is infinitely more rational and substance-based than the
> > > > > > > pundits and the Right fantasize when they lyrically praise the 
> > > > > > > Regular
> > > > > > > American -- at least it is in this time of perceived (and actual
> > > > > > > crisis). What's happening in this country, and in this election, 
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > rather simple and easy to see: (1) the country is in total 
> > > > > > > shambles --
> > > > > > > possibly far worse than what people even realize; (2) we have 
> > > > > > > lived
> > > > > > > for the last eight years under virtually absolute GOP rule; (3) 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > public knows this; (4) the Republican President and his party are
> > > > > > > therefore intensely -- historically -- unpopular; and (5) the 
> > > > > > > voting
> > > > > > > public doesn't want to continue living under the rule of the same
> > > > > > > faction and same political party that has driven the country into 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > ground. Having Sarah Palin drop her gerund endings and desperately
> > > > > > > trotting out the standard, tired GOP attack ads to depict Obama 
> > > > > > > as a
> > > > > > > radical, fist-pumping, America-hating, unhinged socialist -- when
> > > > > > > everyone can see with their own eyes that he isn't -- won't 
> > > > > > > change any
> > > > > > > of that.
>
> > > > > > > 12Next page »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to