Cartoon by NetRightDaily.com
<http://netrightdaily.com/2014/08/cartoon-stable-iraq/>
Who Lost Iraq?

By Thomas Sowell <http://freedomsback.com/author/thomas-sowell/>

June 9, 2015, 7:05 am



After the pro-Western government of China was forced to flee to the island
of Taiwan in 1949, when the Communists took over mainland China, bitter
recriminations in Washington led to the question: “Who lost China?” China
was, of course, never ours to lose, though it might be legitimate to ask if
a different American policy toward China could have led to a different
outcome.

In more recent years, however, Iraq was in fact ours to lose, after U.S.
troops vanquished Saddam Hussein’s army and took over the country. Today,
we seem to be in the process of losing Iraq, if not to ISIS, then to Iran,
whose troops are in Iraq fighting ISIS.

While mistakes were made by both the Bush administration and the Obama
administration, those mistakes were of different kinds and of different
magnitudes in their consequences, though both sets of mistakes are worth
thinking about, so that so much tragic waste of blood and treasure does not
happen again.

Whether it was a mistake to invade Iraq in the first place is something
that will no doubt be debated by historians and others for years to come.
But, despite things that could have been done differently in Iraq during
the Bush administration, in the end President Bush listened to his generals
and launched the military “surge” that crushed the terrorist insurgents and
made Iraq a viable country.

The most solid confirmations of the military success in Iraq were the
intercepted messages from Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq to their leaders in
Pakistan that there was no point sending more insurgents, because they now
had no chance of prevailing against American forces. This was the situation
that Barack Obama inherited — and lost.

Going back to square one, what lessons might we learn from the whole
experience of the Iraq war? If nothing else, we should never again imagine
that we can engage in “nation-building” in the sweeping sense that term
acquired in Iraq — least of all building a democratic Arab nation in a
region of the world that has never had such a thing in a history that goes
back thousands of years.

Human beings are not inert building blocks, and democracy has prerequisites
that Western nations took centuries to develop. Perhaps the reshaping of
German society and Japanese society under American occupation after World
War II made such a project seem doable in Iraq.

Had the Bush administration pulled it off, such an achievement in the
Middle East could have been a magnificent gift to the entire world,
bringing peace to a region that has been the spearhead of war and
international terrorism.

Germany and Japan had been transformed from belligerent military powers
threatening world peace for more than half a century to two of the most
pacifist nations on earth, in both cases after years of American occupation
reshaped these societies. Why not Iraq?

First of all, Germany and Japan were already nations before the American
occupation. There was no “nation-building” to do. But Iraq was a collection
of bitter rivals — Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds, for example — who had never
resolved their differences to form a nation, but were instead held together
only by an iron dictatorship, as Yugoslavia once was.

Replacing German and Japanese dictatorships with democracy after World War
II was a challenge. But both countries remained under American military
governments for years, slowly gaining such self-governing powers as the
military overseers chose, and at such a pace as these overseers deemed
prudent in the light of conditions on the ground.

American authorities did not rush to set up an independent government, able
to operate at cross purposes because it was “democratically elected” in a
country without the prerequisites of a viable democracy.

Despite the mistakes that were made in Iraq, it was still a viable country
until Barack Obama made the headstrong decision to pull out all the troops,
ignoring his own military advisers, just so he could claim to have restored
“peace,” when in fact he invited chaos and defeat.

This is only the latest of Obama’s gross misjudgments about Iraq, going
back to his Senate days, when he vehemently opposed the military “surge”
that crushed the terrorist insurgency, as did Senator Hillary Clinton also,
by the way.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmajM0M251BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MzM5Njk3MTk->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNG5mdjJ0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQzMzk2OTcyMA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to