http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/07/intelligence-panels-cut-off-aid-to-syrian-rebels-obama-says-he-will-arm-them-anyway.html
****

** **
July 11, 2013**** Intelligence panels cut off aid to Syrian rebels, Obama
says he will arm them anyway****

The weapons we supplied to the "rebels" in Libya not only made their way to
Syria but were used in the jihadist attack on our consulate in Benghazi.
It's prudent and wise for members of the intelligence panel to stop arming
the jihadists in Syria. The jihadists in Syria (like their brothers in
Libya) are linked to al Qaeda and have displayed unimaginable savagery and
cannibalism.****

House and Senate Intelligence panel members vote to block Obama from arming
Syrian jihadis, but Obama going to arm them
anyway<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/07/house-and-senate-intelligence-panel-members-vote-to-block-obama-from-arming-syrian-jihadis-but-obama.html>Jihadwatch
****

Obama quickly moving to stifle this outbreak of common sense in Washington.
"Intelligence panels cut off aid to Syrian rebels by restricting funds," by
Julian Pecquet and Jeremy Herb for The
Hill<http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/309995-intel-panels-blocked-obamas-syrian-aid-by-restricting-funds#ixzz2YcOUOxP4>,
July 9 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):****

House and Senate Intelligence panel members have voted to block President
Obama from arming Syrian rebels, committee insiders told The Hill. They did
so by placing severe restrictions on funding.****

*Lawmakers made their decision last month for fear that the administration
plan would let weapons fall into the hands of terrorist groups, such as the
many linked to al Qaeda.*****

The exact nature of the restrictions is unknown because the committees
voted privately on the basis of classified information.* What is known is
that the restrictions are sufficient to prevent the administration from
delivering arms as planned,* according to a source familiar with the
actions.****

The committee “voted to allow them to make some movement on this, but it’s
restricted,” said one Senate panel insider, who declined to elaborate on
the total aid or the restrictions added by the Intelligence panels, which
both met again on Tuesday. “It was a very restrictive amount.”****

Administration officials stopped shy of saying that the efforts had
thwarted the effort to arm rebel groups, but said it certainly didn’t make
it easier.****

“They’re raising a lot of questions without having alternative answers,”
said one senior administration official.****

“Whatever we do, we have to make sure we do it right,” Rep. Dutch
Ruppersberger (D-Md.), the ranking member of the House Intelligence
Committee, said Tuesday. ****

“If we are going to arm, we have to make sure we have control of what arms
are out there and how people are trained to use those arms so they don’t
fall into the hands of our enemy al Qaeda,” Ruppersberger said. ****

Ruppersberger would not discuss what actions his committee had taken, but
said that they were providing oversight.****

“We have funding oversight, and that’s part of the checks and balances,” he
said.****

*The administration has pushed to sell its plan to lawmakers in Congress,
and Secretary of State John Kerry and Vice President Biden both briefed the
panels in June on the administration’s plans in Syria....*****

White House press secretary Jay Carney did not discuss the reasons behind
the congressional delays over the aid on Tuesday, but said it was coming
nonetheless.****

“In keeping with the president’s announcement of our stepped-up assistance
to the [Syrian opposition’s] Supreme Military Council, we are going to
consult with Congress on these matters, and we intend to provide that
stepped-up assistance,” Carney said at Tuesday’s White House briefing. “We
were not bluffing. The president was very serious, as I think he made
clear.”****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to