On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > On 2025-02-21 04:03, David Holmes wrote: > > I would not like to see it happen that way. If it is to happen then I > > would prefer to see a project established and a project repo. > > [...snip...] > > I think that could work as well, but I guess the difficult part will be to > get reviewers from the relevant areas.
I'm happy to go whichever way the OpenJDK community thinks is the best approach. On advantage I see from our perspective with the separate project repo is that it may be easier to do a bit of experimentation and testing different approaches before a merge into the mainline. It will still be possible to do a phased approach to merging the changes into the mainline, so that should give any reviewers that didn't come around for the first merges into the project repo a second chance to voice their concerns. > Also, I don't know if this has been said before, but this work requires a > JEP. No, I haven't heard anything about that (I think). I'll read up on it, and get back if I need a hand to hold on to :) Take care! Harald
