On 2018/06/24 13:51, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:42:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Like realpath, this is another of those things where I think if it makes > > sense to have on OpenBSD at all, base is a better place for it .. > We have jot(1) in base; different synopsis but more versatile already. > > $ jot -s' ' 10 1 10 1 > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >
We do, and we also have a number of slightly annoying patches to ports to use this instead of seq. (Also like realpath, it's something that could be reasonably be handled as a __progname switch in jot ..)
