It's mostly a matter of being globally careful about not reading things into memory that you don't need. For 2.0 we're just going to use the new index structure, so the 2D index will use the same machinery as the geography index.
P. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Martin Davis <mbda...@refractions.net> wrote: > > > Paul Ramsey wrote: >> >> FYI, it is not the index that is slower, it is the op. The index is >> actually (surprisingly) faster. >> > Wow, that's unexpected. Do you know why this is? Is there a message there > for the current 2D GIST index? > > -- > Martin Davis > Senior Technical Architect > Refractions Research, Inc. > (250) 383-3022 > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
