Michael Oke, II wrote: > As if there were any chance that these supposed anti-taxcut proponents would > voluntarily send in extra money. They don't actually want to pay more, they > just want everyone else to.
Hi Michael, Did you read the article? I think it might have been a not-so-subtle way to tell the libs to STFU. > http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/256116/three-simple-reaganite-ideas-new-congress-deroy-murdock >> "The Higher-Rate Optional Tax would satisfy liberals who don’t like >> their taxes cut. >> >> “I am in the highest tax bracket,” an unidentified woman said in a >> November 30 MoveOn.org commercial that attacks the Obama-GOP tax-cut >> compromise. “We don’t need the money. The country does.” >> >> "No American should be forced to accept an unwanted tax cut. So, the HOT >> Tax would require new language on IRS tax returns: “If you believe your >> tax bracket is too low, please indicate the higher rate at which you >> prefer to be taxed. Multiply that rate by your Adjusted Gross Income. >> Send in that higher amount.” >> >> "The HOT Tax would spare tax-cut opponents from accepting undesired tax >> relief. The rest of us can enjoy the lower taxes we need to pay our >> bills and take care of ourselves and our loved ones. Everybody wins." -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
