See the Dictionary for the intended functionality of 2!:1 http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dx002.htm
I agree that it doesn't sound like it is what you're after, although the current implementation does actually wait (performs similar to 2!:0 actually). On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Charles Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 30, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Tikkanz wrote: > >> Note that there is a bug in 2!:1 >> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-July/015387.html > > OK, I'm confused about what 2!:1 should do, but my application of 2!:x should > wait for the sub-process to complete before moving on. > > To my mind, 2!:3 sounds more like what I'd want in this case, although I > think the best solution for gnuplot is to talk to it via a pipe so that you > could do animated graphs... > > Best, Charles > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
