Nice! This looks quite useful.
Thanks,
David
On 06/08/2013 04:02 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello David,
here is my contribution to the field:
An Ontology for DICOM metadata (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine):
http://purl.org/healthcarevocab/v1
A tool to extract metadata from DICOM files as RDF:
https://github.com/Bonubase/dicom2rdf
Those will be presented in more detail at ODLS 2013:
https://wiki.imise.uni-leipzig.de/Gruppen/OBML/Workshops/2013-ODLS-en
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:37:59PM -0400, David Booth wrote:
On 06/07/2013 01:40 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:>
I think life sciences have been early adopters for a while so this may
be a bit of preaching to the converted :-)
I sure hope so! :)
On 06/07/2013 02:00 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:44:55AM -0700, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote:
We'll still argue about whether we use SNOMED roles, make HL7 rim classes
and roles or openEHR or something else.
Asking for a single extensive ontology about the world - or even about a
limited subject - that suits all needs is a bit naive.
Agreed. That's why RDF approach that is advocated does not make that
assumption.
The nice thing about RDF is that you can have all of them in a single
triple
store, map them onto each other and make up your own roles if none of them
suit you.
Exactly. The Yosemite Manifesto at http://goo.gl/mBUrZ was
intentionally kept simple, but the issue of how semantic alignment can
be achieved was also addressed in the workshop. See slides at:
http://dbooth.org/2013/semtech/slides/03-DavidBooth-rdf-as-universal.pdf
All slides from the workshop, and some videos of the workshop that were
kindly made by Tom Munnecke -- Thank you Tom! -- are available at:
http://dbooth.org/2013/semtech/
David
