The minutes from the November 20 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
<http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-minutes.html>
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before December 4 (the next
Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Widgets Voice Conference
20 Nov 2008
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2008OctDec/0253.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-irc
Attendees
Present
Art, David, Benoit, MikeSmith-IRC, Jere-IRC
Regrets
Arve, Nick
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda Review
2. [6]Annoucements
3. [7]Issue #19 http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19
4. [8]APIs and Events spec
5. [9]AOB
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Date: 20 November 2008
<scribe> Scribe: Art
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
Agenda Review
AB: any change proposals for today's agenda
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/02
53.html ?
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2008OctDec/0253.html
[None]
Annoucements
<JereK> ArtB, only IRC this time
AB: I sent a proposal to change the VC time
...
[12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/2008OctDec/00
30.html
... Responses are due by Nov 24
... any issues for people?
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/
2008OctDec/0030.html
BS: it would be better for me if was 1 hour later from the proposed
time
... 16:00 would be better for me
AB: please send your comments to the mail list
... I believe one prob is that 16:00 Paris will conflict with XML
Security WG's VC
Issue #19 [13]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19
[13] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19
DR: I think we don't have the right people to discuss this
... In particular Mark, Marcos and Thomas
AB: does that concern apply to all of the sub-bullets?
DR: yes, certainly
AB: I tend to agree
... The next opportunity to discuss this is December 4
DR: can we arrange an interim call?
AB: yes, I think that is possible
... but I don't know about the probability of success
DR: there could be some discussions
AB: my proposal is multi-part:
... 1. Everyone should discuss these items on the public mail list
... 2. Regarding the questions for XML Sec WG, need a proposed
resolution
DR: I can take an action for #2 above and coordinate a response
<scribe> ACTION: David submit a proposal for Mark's questions
([14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0
242.html) [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-minutes.html#action01]
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2008OctDec/0242.html)
AB: any comments about those questions?
... a question I have is about the priority e.g. v1 or v2
DR: I think we need answers now
AB: a related I have is do we need to block on answers?
DR: yes we do
AB: we agree they are important
... and that we cannot proceed without some help from the XML Sec WG
... anything else on the DigSig spec?
[ None ]
APIs and Events spec
AB: Arve told me yesterday that he would not be able to make today's
call
... this again means we will need to postpone discussions
... any other comments on this spec?
[ None ]
AOB
AB: one thing is next VC
... It will be December 4
... There will be no VC on December 11 because of the security
Workshop
... This means then, there will be just two more calls in 2008
BS: We will need to use one of those calls to discuss LC for the P&C
... That was planned
AB: yes, that's what we discussed before
... I don't know if that is realistic anymore
... We need Marcos in that discussion
... any other business?
DR: current status of the documents
... has that been updated recently?
AB: I only update that after we make a publication
DR: regarding Editor help for the APIs and Events spec, Claudio
volunteered and that's OK with us
... If more help is needed I think we can help
AB: anything else?
[ None ]
AB: meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: David submit a proposal for Mark's questions
([16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0
242.html) [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-minutes.html#action01]
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2008OctDec/0242.html
[End of minutes]
