On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Ashley Penney <apen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> but I believe our intent was that the first 1.0.0 would have a stable API > and I think that was why it's still considered a 0. release. I think he > wanted to do a few more things in terms of the parameters before calling it > a 1.0. This is my view as well and I think it's the right call. The 0. series gives us a little breathing room for experimentation and refinement while our newly dedicated engineering team bring these modules up to snuff. We should be able to quickly stabilize each of the Puppet Labs modules to a solid >=1.0.0 state where they'll all be regularly and expertly maintained while strictly following SemVer rules. I do empathize regarding the temporary instability for the few modules that require it and I'll make sure that we clearly spell out what's happening in the readme and changelog. -- Ryan Coleman | Modules & Forge | @ryanycoleman | ryancoleman in #puppet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
