On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 04:43:27PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 4/29/26 11:40 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/29/26 4:07 PM, Arun Menon wrote:
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:15:16PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/28/26 8:57 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/28/26 3:01 AM, Arun Menon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With MAX() it can now be bigger than TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX if the
> > > > > > > backend says
> > > > > > > so -- hm...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX is still 4096.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, I had still based my patches on your TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX increase
> > > > > to
> > > > > 8192 bytes. Let me fixes this along with a few other things. I will
> > > > > let
> > > > > you know.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have another series that I will post now that can be applied to
> > > > > master. It's adding a test for TIS over I2C but I will need to extend
> > > > > that one also with the large transfer test case then.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > So I have resolved this issue now along with a few other things.
> > > > My branch
> > > > is here: https://github.com/stefanberger/qemu-tpm/tree/work-tpm-for-11.1
> > > >
> > > > - I have applied the i2c swtpm test case series first since it could be
> > > > easily upstreamed first
> > > > - Then your patch "migration/vmstate: Add VMState support for
> > > > GByteArray"
> > > > - Then the CRB chunk + TIS extended buffer support series. I modified my
> > > > patches (last 4 in that series) to
> > > > - increased MAX_TIS_BUFFER_SIZE to 8192
> > > > - added migration blockers dynamically for TIS whenever >4096
> > > > bytes are
> > > > either in the request or response; remove them later on again
> > > > when device
> > > > goes into ready state for example
> > > > - added large transfer test also for i2c
> > > >
> > > > Please pick up those patches for v6 posting, or otherwise you
> > > > can split your
> > > > v5 series up into CRB-only support for v6 and I post my (last 4) patches
> > > > later on.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thank you. I agree. I will post v6 as CRB-only support. The GByteArray
> > > patch is already accepted. The complex TIS changes can be posted
> > > separately later.
> > >
> > > Regarding the TIS buffer: I saw you implemented the migration blockers
> > > and 8192-byte increase in your branch. Should I discard my
> >
> > It's quite dynamic with the blocker being set when 4097 bytes of a TPM
> > command were received or when a TPM response with > 4096 bytes is
> > received. The blocker is removed when the device goes into ready state.
> > The intention is to allow a user to choose an old machine type with a
> > PQC-enabled swtpm+libtpms and be able to migrate to an older version of
> > QEMU unless the blocker was set. Correct me if I am wrong in my
> > thinking...
>
> Another solution would be to limit the 8kb buffer to 4kb for 11.0 and older
> machines.
Yes, I have limited this using the post_load hook for the extended part.
+int tpm_tis_ext_buffer_post_load(TPMState *s)
+{
+ /*
+ * Calculate the maximum extension buffer size allowed, by comparing
+ * the destination VM's backend capacity with TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX.
+ */
+ uint32_t max_ext = s->be_buffer_size > TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX ?
+ s->be_buffer_size - TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX : 0;
+
+ if (s->ext_size > max_ext) {
+ /*
+ * Source buffer size is greater than what the destination backend
+ * allows
+ */
+ g_clear_pointer(&s->ext_buffer, g_free);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (s->ext_size > 0) {
+ memcpy(s->buffer + TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX, s->ext_buffer, s->ext_size);
+ g_clear_pointer(&s->ext_buffer, g_free);
+ }
We may use this patch in future if we want to change static to dynamic
buffer array allocation.
Regards,
Arun Menon
