On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:38:32AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/24/2009 02:17 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:57:02AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>The first such option rom will load at address 0, which isn't very nice,
> >>and the second will report a conflict and abort, which is horrible.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com>
> >>---
> >>
> >>Changes from v1:
> >>- use ->fw_file instead of ->addr to distinguish between host-loaded and
> >>   firmware-loaded roms
> >>- add the same check in a couple more places
> >This patch is a lot better and does not break the versatile platform
> >anymore. I do wonder though if the same change should also be done for
> >find_rom() and rom_copy().
> 
> Since I'm not sure what these are used for, I left them as is.  IMO
> the API should be improved by splitting the functions dealing with
> qemu-loaded and firmware-loaded ROMs to avoid confusion.
> 

I have committed your patch to both stable-0.12 and HEAD. As I think 
these functions have to be changed too, I have committed a patch to do
it, but to HEAD only.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply via email to